06/04/2020, 17:08

Dear Supporters,
As time goes on it becomes increasingly evident that the current lockdown restrictions are not evidence based. For instance, there is no scientific basis for social distancing and the arbitrary distance of 2m.

There are many questions that need answering such as:

Why does the government not employ the treatment of Hydroxychloroquine for the illness? It has been shown to be successful when used in vulnerable patients at the start of symptoms. This same treatment is also being used by leaders as a preventative treatment, why is the government not using it with our vulnerable?
Why does the government not use the MATH+ protocol [1] which uses intravenous methylprednisolone, high-dose intravenous vitamin C, full-dose low molecular weight Heparin and optional treatments with thiamine, zinc and vitamin D?

Evidence is accumulating to show that Hydroxychloroquine - a drug with a 60+ years track record - is an effective treatment for covid19.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) published this article [2] which states, "Hydroxychloroquine Has about 90 Percent Chance of Helping COVID-19 Patients". It also includes this list of peer reviewed studies [3] based on which they conclude that:

"The HCQ-AZ (Hydroxychloroquine - Azithromycin) combination, when started immediately after diagnosis, appears to be a safe and efficient treatment for COVID-19, with a mortality rate of 0.5%, in elderly patients. It avoids worsening and clears virus persistence and contagious infectivity in most cases."

Professor of Epidemiology, Harvey Risch of Yale urges the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin as an early therapy for COVID-19 [4] .

Some of these studies were carried out three months ago in February such as the work of Dr Didier Raoult (the number one global expert on communicable disease according to expertscape.com). So, is the Irish government aware of these studies? Have their advisors been investigating treatments such as above? If so, have they been offered to those at risk that have been diagnosed with covid-19? If not, why not? And how many deaths might have been prevented if they had? Also, if we now have a treatment that is highly effective for the minority of people that are at risk - why are lockdown restrictions still in place?

We know that you feel as we do, we need more signatures to make our voices heard, please ask five people you know to sign our petition today!?

Coming next: Information on flawed Hydroxychloroquine studies and suppression of information on successful treatments

[1] bit.ly/math-plus-protocol
[2] bit.ly/Hydroxychloroquine-AAPS-article
[3] bit.ly/AAPS-peer-review-list
[4] bit.ly/harvey-risch